American Bloggers Beware! (part 3)
22 January 2015
American Bloggers Beware! (part 1) and American Bloggers Beware! (part 2) — Islamic supremacists around the world have been working hard to persecute and prosecute bloggers who dare commit the “sin” of criticizing Islam. I wrote in Part 1:
Lest you think this kind of persecution of those who express their opinions about Islam on the Internet is something that happens only in repressive, fanatical Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia ... it is also starting to happen in “Judeo-Christian” Western countries as well. Your Islamic future is getting closer than you think!Western media and governments are too brain-dead and/or wussy to tell the truth about Islam. Those Web sites that do, including this one, are becoming more and more of a target for Islamic supremacists and their Western lackeys who further Islam’s totalitarian goals.
During the first few weeks of this new year, there have already been new indications that the pro-Islam noose in America is tightening. There have been a number of reports by Robert Spencer on his Jihad Watch Web site highlighting the growing menace. And wouldn’t you know that Hussein Obama is leading the way!
In White House: Obama will fight media to stop anti-jihad articles we read:
President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said January 12.In International Union of Muslim Scholars calls on UN to criminalize “contempt of religions” we read:
“The president ... will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing....
Whenever journalists consider publishing materials disliked by jihadis, “I think there are a couple of absolutes,” he told the reporters.... it is the president’s duty to lobby editors and reporters against publishing anti-jihadi information, he said. “This president, as the Commander-in-chief, believes strongly in the responsibility that he has to advocate for our men and women in uniform, particularly if it’s going to make them safer,” Earnest said.
In a statement released Tuesday, the Qatar-based International Union of Muslim Scholars, headed by influential preacher Yusuf al-Qaradawi, said there should be protection for “prophets” and urged Islamic countries to submit a draft law to the United Nations calling for defamation of religions to be outlawed. The union said the UN should then issue a “law criminalising contempt of religions and the prophets and all the holy sites.”In Obama’s State of the Union Address: “We continue to reject offensive stereotypes of Muslims” we read:
Last night in his State of the Union address, Barack Obama said this: “As Americans, we respect human dignity, even when we’re threatened, which is why ... we continue to reject offensive stereotypes of Muslims — the vast majority of whom share our commitment to peace.”In Vanderbilt University: Muslim Brotherhood-linked student group tries to bully professor who criticized Islam into silence we read:
“Offensive stereotypes of Muslims,” however obnoxious [those stereotypes] may be, don’t make us unsafe. What makes us unsafe is the general (and bipartisan) unwillingness to face the jihad threat realistically and honestly. And that is what Obama is likely referring to when he says that “we continue to reject offensive stereotypes of Muslims — the vast majority of whom share our commitment to peace.” He is saying that examinations of how jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and make recruits among peaceful Muslims will remain out of bounds.
A black Vanderbilt University professor’s op-ed critical of Islamic terrorism has touched off a wave of protest by Muslim students and other critics.Little by little, the noose tightens around the neck of free speech in America. As I wrote in Jihad Against Free Speech:
The op-ed author is Carol Swain, a longtime professor of law and political science at Vanderbilt and a self-proclaimed political conservative. Her op-ed, entitled Charlie Hebdo attacks prove critics were right about Islam, appeared in The Tennessean (Nashville’s main newspaper) on January 15.
Swain, who opposes burqas and advocates stronger efforts at assimilation for American Muslims, argued that Islam “poses an absolute danger to us and our children unless it is monitored better than it has been under the Obama administration.”
In response, Muslim students, led by Vanderbilt undergraduate Farishtay Yamin, took great offense. She told The Vanderbilt Hustler, the campus newspaper, that she “could not believe her eyes” when she read Swain’s column. The student also quickly labeled Swain’s opinion as “hate speech.”
Yamin, who is the publicity chair for Vanderbilt’s Muslim Student Association, said in no uncertain terms that the black female professor’s speech must be restricted if she says “these kinds of things” in the future.
For Islamic supremacists, suicide bombings, crashing planes into buildings, and various other forms of violence are not the only methods of jihad, just the most spectacular. The old nursery rhyme, "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me," definitely does not ring true for Muslims. On the contrary, they are so hypersensitive that criticism of Islam is considered insulting and blasphemous, resulting in a death sentence in some parts of the world.I have little doubt that one day you will come to this Web site and it will not be here any more. But it won’t be because of a DDoS attack, like Pamela Geller has been experiencing this past week. Instead, the U.S. government will have pulled the plug on it, and I will be in jail — or perhaps even dead.
Nevertheless, I will continue to stick out my neck for Muslims by proclaiming the truth about Islam. Why? Because Yeshua (Isa, Jesus) loves Muslims and died for them so they could be set free from their bondage to the demonic impostor-god Allah, and have a loving relationship with Father God.
The time is getting short. The frigid darkness of the Islamic Winter night is descending. In relation to this reality, the words of Yeshua are very striking and relevant:
Yeshua said to His disciples, “Let us go back to Judea.”
“But Rabbi,” they said, “a short while ago the Jewish leaders tried to kill You, and yet You are going back?”
Yeshua answered, “Are there not twelve hours of daylight? Anyone who walks in the daytime will not stumble, because they see the light of this world. It is when a person walks at night that they stumble, because the light is not in them.” (John 11:7‑10)
“As long as it is day, we must do the works of Him who sent Me. Night is coming, when no one can work.” (John 9:4)
You can send comments to me privately at: firstname.lastname@example.org
There are no reader comments for this blog entry. Why don't you be the first to write one?